LLiberty Precedent
Menu
SIDE-BY-SIDE CASE LAB

Compare like authority with like authority.

Filter by case type—FA to FA, tort to tort, employment to employment—then choose exactly which parts of the cases you want beside each other.

2cases selected

180 authenticated opinions match the current filters.

Choose comparison rows

Swipe sideways to compare each selected case →

Case comparison7 rows shown
● AUTHENTICATED

Marshall v. City of Tulsa

2024 OK 78 · No. 122429
Open opinion ↗
● AUTHENTICATED

Watson v. BNSF Railway Co.

2024 OK 74 · No. 119256
Open opinion ↗
Facts
This is a torts & government matter. The authenticated record identifies Tulsa County as the trial-court origin. The complete legally material facts must be taken from the linked opinion.
This is a torts & damages matter. The authenticated record identifies Pawnee County as the trial-court origin. The complete legally material facts must be taken from the linked opinion.
Issue
Study question: How did Oklahoma law govern this torts & government dispute in the posture described as appeal from summary judgment?
Study question: How did Oklahoma law govern this torts & damages dispute in the posture described as certiorari review after jury verdict?
Rule
The authenticated holding summary supplies the starting proposition: A pet-sitter with care and control of a dog qualified as an owner for Oklahoma's dog-bite statute, and the City owed no duty on the record presented.
The authenticated holding summary supplies the starting proposition: Reviewed challenged jury instructions following a defense verdict in a railroad-crossing wrongful-death and personal-injury action.
Analysis
Oklahoma Supreme Court reviewed the matter through appeal from summary judgment. The authenticated decision record reports the result as trial court judgment affirmed. Read the full opinion for the court's reasoning, authorities, and treatment of competing arguments.
Oklahoma Supreme Court reviewed the matter through certiorari review after jury verdict. The authenticated decision record reports the result as see authenticated full opinion. Read the full opinion for the court's reasoning, authorities, and treatment of competing arguments.
Holding
A pet-sitter with care and control of a dog qualified as an owner for Oklahoma's dog-bite statute, and the City owed no duty on the record presented.
Reviewed challenged jury instructions following a defense verdict in a railroad-crossing wrongful-death and personal-injury action.
Disposition
Trial court judgment affirmed
See authenticated full opinion
Procedural history
Appeal from summary judgment → Trial court judgment affirmed
Certiorari review after jury verdict → See authenticated full opinion

Source boundary: holding, disposition, court, date, docket, county coding, and posture come from the authenticated record. Facts, issue framing, rule labels, and analysis are study scaffolds. Read each opinion and use a current citator before relying on the comparison.