LLiberty Precedent
Menu
Research›Business, Construction & Attorney Fees›Tomahawk Resources, Inc. v. Craven
OKLAHOMA SUPREME COURT · November 15, 2005

Tomahawk Resources, Inc. v. Craven

2005 OK 82 · Case No. 100437
Authenticated

Curated and source-checked by Liberty Dolberry · Verification methodology

Holding / issue summary

Both sides were prevailing parties on separate claims despite an offset that produced a net judgment for only one side, so the homeowners were also entitled to reasonable attorney fees.

Court
Oklahoma Supreme Court
Docket
100437
Decided
November 15, 2005
Issue
Business, Construction & Attorney Fees
Posture
Certiorari review of prevailing-party attorney-fee ruling
Disposition
Court of Civil Appeals vacated; trial court affirmed in part and reversed in part; remanded
Origin
Not mapped — consult opinion
Authentication
Oklahoma State Courts Network (OSCN) checked 2026-08-13
Citator
Not citator-checked

Citation formats

BluebookTomahawk Resources, Inc. v. Craven, 2005 OK 82.
APATomahawk Resources, Inc. v. Craven, 2005 OK 82 (2005).
MLA“Tomahawk Resources, Inc. v. Craven.” Oklahoma Supreme Court, 2005, 2005 OK 82.
Research check

Existence and identifying metadata are authenticated. Confirm publication status, subsequent history, quotations, pinpoint pages, and court-required format before filing.