Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. City of Oklahoma City

2005 OK 2 · Case No. 100413 / 100538

Authenticated

Curated and source-checked by Liberty Dolberry · Verification methodology

Holding / issue summary

The appeals were premature because related qui tam claims remained pending and the challenged orders did not terminate the multi-claim action.

Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Docket: 100413 / 100538
Decided: January 11, 2005
Issue: Civil Procedure & Appeals
Posture: Consolidated appeals in multi-party declaratory and qui tam litigation
Disposition: Appeals dismissed as premature; remanded
Origin: Oklahoma
Authentication: Oklahoma State Courts Network (OSCN) checked 2026-08-13
Citator: Not citator-checked

Citation formats

BluebookOklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. City of Oklahoma City, 2005 OK 2.

APAOklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. City of Oklahoma City, 2005 OK 2 (2005).

MLA“Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. City of Oklahoma City.” Oklahoma Supreme Court, 2005, 2005 OK 2.

Research check

Existence and identifying metadata are authenticated. Confirm publication status, subsequent history, quotations, pinpoint pages, and court-required format before filing.