OBI Holding Co. v. Schultz-Butzbach

2025 OK 55 · Case No. 122347

Authenticated

Curated and source-checked by Liberty Dolberry · Verification methodology

Holding / issue summary

A timely hearing request did not eliminate the claimant's continuing duty under 85A O.S. § 69(A)(4) to receive or seek benefits during each six-month period in the life of the claim.

Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Docket: 122347
Decided: September 9, 2025
Issue: Employment & Workers' Compensation
Posture: Appeal from Commission order denying employer's motion to dismiss
Disposition: Commission order vacated; motion to dismiss granted
Origin: Statewide / Workers' Compensation Commission
Authentication: Oklahoma State Courts Network (OSCN) checked 2026-08-13
Citator: Not citator-checked

Citation formats

BluebookOBI Holding Co. v. Schultz-Butzbach, 2025 OK 55.

APAOBI Holding Co. v. Schultz-Butzbach, 2025 OK 55 (2025).

MLA“OBI Holding Co. v. Schultz-Butzbach.” Oklahoma Supreme Court, 2025, 2025 OK 55.

Research check

Existence and identifying metadata are authenticated. Confirm publication status, subsequent history, quotations, pinpoint pages, and court-required format before filing.