Marshall v. City of Tulsa

2024 OK 78 · Case No. 122429

Authenticated

Holding / issue summary

A pet-sitter with care and control of a dog qualified as an owner for Oklahoma's dog-bite statute, and the City owed no duty on the record presented.

Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Docket: 122429
Decided: November 6, 2024
Issue: Torts & Government
Posture: Appeal from summary judgment
Disposition: Trial court judgment affirmed
Origin: Tulsa
Authentication: Justia full-text opinion checked 2026-08-13

Citation formats

BluebookMarshall v. City of Tulsa, 2024 OK 78.

APAMarshall v. City of Tulsa, 2024 OK 78 (2024).

MLA“Marshall v. City of Tulsa.” Oklahoma Supreme Court, 2024, 2024 OK 78.

Research check

Existence and identifying metadata are authenticated. Confirm publication status, subsequent history, quotations, pinpoint pages, and court-required format before filing.